|
CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF CITIZENS IGNORED
Now the question is whether the common citizen of India has a
constitutional status and power and whether the rights and powers of an
ordinary citizen should be respected and protected by the government or
sacrificed for the interests of political parties and people holding
chairs in the top hierarchy of the parliamentary democracy and
judiciary? When the preamble of the constitution declares the very
common citizen as the most powerful with highest constitutional status
and power while saying, “We the people of India”, it was shocking to see
the leaders of ruling Congress party condemning the non-violent movement
started with Anna Hazare as its face as illegal and unconstitutional.
The statements of Congress leaders, whose only intention was to prove
Anna’s hunger strike and the movement joined by millions across the
country wrong, not only did defy the constitutional authority of the
citizens of India but they also exposed how feudalism still rules over
the democratic system of India.
The irony with the current UPA government ruling over India is that
instead of respecting the voice of people, the leaders of Congress often
try to suppress the voice by using its force and by targeting the
individual who leads the movement. Like, the leaders targeted Baba
Ramdev terming him a cheat, a fraud and finally attacking his camp in
the midnight, the government here arrested Anna and over 2500 of his
supporters to fizzle out the movement that bore a little hope for the
citizens of the whole country. These steps by a democratically elected
government reminded the citizens of the atrocities by the colonial
government of the pre-independence days when India as a nation didn’t
exist. The steps brought no gain but turned fatal to the government with
the support to Anna growing further and the movement swelling every next
moment. The urban middle class turned outrageous with the feeling that
their rights to oppose anything wrong and fatal to the nation have been
seized.
UPA GOVERNMENT’S DUALITY TOWARDS ISSUE OF CORRUPTION
There was a little hope when the government accepted to bring the Lokpal
bill in the parliament and constituted a drafting committee after Anna’s
four days hunger strike in the month of April 2011. But the hope didn’t
sustain as the government prepared a draft omitting Prime Minister,
Judges in the higher judiciary and the Members of the Parliament on the
plea that empowering the Lokpal to prosecute persons holding the
aforesaid positions would endanger their constitutional status and
power.
Unlike the president of India, Prime Minister is one among the equals as
per Indian Constitution. So, if others in the ministry and the officials
at the top level can be prosecuted by the Lokpal, then why the Prime
Minister can’t be? And, at a time when the Prime Ministers of the
country have been named in many scams including the recent 2G spectrum
scam, there is no point keeping the person in position out of ambit of
Lokpal. The provision of prosecution would rather become an opportunity
for the PM to save his own face and that of the government by explaining
before Lokpal the stand and position of his own and his government as
well.
Same is the case of higher judiciary which has also failed in keeping
its sanctity intact. Allegations of corruption in higher judiciary have
come in numbers during the past years. Even members of judiciary
including the Chief Justice of India have also hinted upon the fact on
different occasions. And, if a justice can face impeachment in the house
of parliament where the problem in bringing them within the ambit of
Lokpal?
Omission of people in some specific positions points at the duality that
UPA government is maintaining towards the issue of corruption. When the
Prime Minister claims that his government is working to minimize
corruption and bring complete transparency in the system of governance,
what is the point in keeping the person in the position out of Lokpal’s
ambit? In fact, as a display of his government’s will, if at all it is
there, to bring transparency and also to bring down the level of
corruption in public offices, the Prime Minister must volunteer to keep
himself open for prosecution in case any grave allegation that indicates
his or his office’ involvement in something wrong.
MANDATE IS NO LICENSE FOR CORRUPTION AND UNLAWFUL ACTION
Replying to the question why the Prime Minister is kept out of ambit of
the forthcoming Lokpal, Rahul Gandhi said during his Orissa visit in the
month of July that, “we suggested that the Prime Minister should not be
prosecuted because, in such a position, the person needs more
flexibility and freedom to work for the country”.
But what to when the Prime Minister’s name comes in a huge scam of 1.76
lakh crore rupees; when the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) engages itself
in favouring companies that are into unlawful activities in India, like
pursuing hard for the largest FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) project
POSCO that operates without a valid MoU with the government and, also,
influencing the ministries to grant permission to POSCO etc? who should
be accountable for such unlawful acts under thorough insistence of PMO?
While defending the position of the government senior congress leaders
like Kapil Sibbal and party spokes person often rubbish the movement
against corruption and the hunger strike by Anna Hazare. While senior
Congress leaders like Pranab Mukherjee argue that Anna is not a law
maker and, only, the parliament can only do it. Many even termed Anna as
a blackmailer. More often, the leaders of Congress party cited at the
people’s mandate that placed them in power. Is the mandate obtained in
the last election a license for rampant corruption and scams taken place
in the last years and has it been obtained to implement such a Lokpal
bill that can prosecute small Pisces in the ocean of corruption leaving
the whales to roam free?
POLITICAL LEADERSHIP: PARTY FIRST, COUNTRY NEXT
It seems that Congress party leaders have come down to the bottom of
integrity by using people’s mandate to justify their acts that are
clearly against the people of the land. Anti-corruption slogans by the
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi and the
Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi are just political slogans
without a bit of will to make India a corruption free country. Rather,
the actions to suppress the voice of people against corruption raise
number of questions about the integrity and credential of the Congress
Party, its leaders and the UPA government. The way the party leaders are
defending the actions of the government intended to suppress the
people’s movement against corruption, there is no point disbelieving
that the Congress leaders are more party men than Indians. |